20/09/2021

Licensing Consultant

Not just any technology

Uber found to have breached privacy of 1.2 million Aussies in 2016 – Security

Uber failed to appropriately defend the own information of a lot more than a million...

Uber failed to appropriately defend the own information of a lot more than a million Australian shoppers and drivers when it was compromised in a 2016 hack, the privacy commission has identified.

In a long-awaited determination released on Friday, privacy commissioner Angelene Falk disclosed the world wide trip sharing business experienced interfered with the privacy of 1.two million Australians by failing to comply with the Privateness Act.

The resolve follows a “complex” investigation into US-dependent Uber Technologies and its Dutch-dependent subsidiary, Uber B.V, adhering to a cyber assault that took position in October and November 2016.

Uber disclosed the breach – which impacted fifty seven million users and drivers globally – in November 2017 and claimed it to the Workplace of the Australian Information Commissioner in December 2017.

The business paid out the attackers US$a hundred,000 at the time to delete the stolen information, which integrated the names, e mail addresses and mobile mobile phone numbers of shoppers, and retain peaceful.

On Friday, the OAIC explained Uber experienced breached the Privateness Act by “not getting realistic ways to defend Australian’s own information for unauthorised access and to wipe out or de-identify the information as required”.

The commission explained the business also “failed to consider realistic ways to implement procedures, strategies and programs to be certain compliance with the Australian Privateness Principles”.

“Rather than disclosing the breach responsibly, Uber paid out the attackers a reward as a result of a bug bounty software for determining a protection vulnerability,” OAIC explained in a assertion on Friday.

“Uber did not perform a total assessment of the own information that may perhaps have been accessed until finally practically a year after the information breach and did not publicly disclose the information breach until finally November 2017.”

Falk explained that regulatory motion was warranted in Australia adhering to the cyber assault, but did not go as far as imposing a wonderful like the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Workplace (ICO) did in 2018.

In addition to the fines, which ammounted to 385,000 pounds in the Uk and 600,000 euros in the Netherlands, Uber also agreed to fork out a US$148 million settlement with fifty US states and Washington DC in September 2018.

In Australia, the OAIC has purchased Uber to put together a information retention and destruction coverage, information protection software and incident response strategy in just 3 months, as very well as appoint an impartial specialist to overview the steps and report to OAIC in just 5 months.

“We need to have to be certain that in long run Uber protects the own information of Australians in line with the Privateness Act,” Falk explained.

Falk included that the issue also “raises advanced concerns around the application of the Privateness Act to abroad-dependent companies that outsource the handling of Australians’ own information to other companies in just their company group”.

The resolve reveals the own information of Australians was transferred to servers in the US underneath an outsourcing arrangement, which Uber argued was not subject to Australia’s privacy regulations.

“This resolve helps make my check out of world wide corporations’ obligations underneath Australian privacy legislation very clear,” Falk included.

“Australians need to have assurance that they are secured by the Privateness Act when they offer own information to a business, even if it is transferred abroad in just the company team.”

In response to the resolve, Uber explained it experienced created a series of technological improvements due to the fact the incident, which include “acquiring ISO 27001 certification of our main rides company information programs and updating inner protection procedures”.

“We are confident that these changes in protection and governance will deal with the resolve created by the OAIC, and will do the job with a 3rd-party assessor to implement any even further changes necessary,” a spokesperson explained.

“We welcome this resolution to the 2016 information incident. We understand from our issues and reiterate our dedication to proceed to receive the rely on of users.”

Current at four:38pm to contain Uber assertion